Eng102:Exercise: Pro and Cons of types of research
sources
Summary: What are the sources available for a research paper? Students will hit the obvious ones: books, magazines, websites etc – but A)What are some of the lesser known but sometimes more valuable sources available, and B)What are the pros and cons of each type of source?
PROBLEM:
I. YOU HAVE 1 BOOK MINIMUM TO USE FOR YOUR FIRST
PAPER. . That leaves 2 more sources required.
II. YOU HAVE 2 BOOKS MINIMUM TO USE FOR YOUR BIG
PAPER. That leaves 6 more sources
required.
OR….
Which sources should you
consider? (Those with a * next to
them are highly recommended).
Sources list with pro and
con (as attachment)
A. Encyclopedia: Best for
summaries; For general overview; topics that are not current events 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: your topic is
still too general and you want to know subtopics, narrow topic down, or want to know important/debated issues
in the subject 2)Good for finding this
type of information: general info only, 1st look/summary of a
topic you don’t know, place to find important terms in topic for further
research 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: not good for
recent events or very “hot” timely topics; normally not good for quotes or
detailed examples, since usually provides
summary/summarized information 4)Problems in using this
source: Quoting from an
encyclopedia is an easy way to wind up with weak content. 5) Source Reliability:
generally more objective |
B. Book:
Best if you are interested in the topic; for in depth understanding of topic
as a whole 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: you have genuine interest in your subject, want to
learn more about it, have the time to read 2)Good for finding this
type of information: quotes,
examples, theories, ideas, opinions, concepts, broader understanding,
understanding of specific subtopics 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: use as a
source when you have to hand in paper in two hours; also check publishing
date to make sure its recent! Check
publisher name to make sure its not Vanity Press (author pays to publish
himself) or biased publisher (eg, Revolutionary Army Press) 4)Problems in using this
source: Books take time to read,
even using tricks such as index, TOC, and reviews to narrow down to chapters
of use; You may not be able to find the book in the shelves; May be very technical: requiring in some cases prior knowledge of the topic
(this can be a good or bad thing); 5) Source Reliability: Can range from objective, to covering many
points of view, to bias. To
test: look up author on Amazon.com or
in yahoo.com and see if he’s considered an authority, a specialist, one
sided, or a nutcase, |
C. Magazine: Good for specialist subtopics; for detailed examples in plain
English you can read at one sitting, some statistics 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: your topic is timely, is a current event or recent
issue. Good if you need current
application or examples. 2)Good for finding this
type of information: local
interest topics, quotes, examples, opinions, general issues and points of
view. 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: use as main
source, since article may be biased or too localized or targeted mainly to a
particular type of readership 4)Problems in using this
source: Many magazines have
agendas – the agenda of their audience.
For example: A republican magazine will leave out some facts or points
of view or insult away opposition; an Environmental Group magazine may focus
on “mother earth” to the exclusion of all other concerns for the average
working person. If using magazines as
a source, make sure to also address the opposition argument. 5) Source Reliability: Varies, from sensationalist (Soldier of
Fortune) to too basic (Reader’s Digest) to biased to overly specialized. |
D. Journal: Good for in-depth look at a specialist subtopic; makes for technical
language, statistics & specific strong examples, both pro and con 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: You need a magazine style periodical for a
specialized audience or a very specific/specialized topic 2)Good for finding this
type of information: High quality
very specific examples, technical language, authoritative opinions, hot
topics/new discoveries or ideas 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: summary knowledge
or browsing. 4)Problems in using this
source: Hard reading for anyone
not a member of the field; may require re-reading to fully understand. May require some searching to find issues. 5) Source Reliability:
normally addresses opposing points of view, but sometimes with smoke &
mirrors. Good biblio. & use of citations. |
E. Newspaper: Good for local interest
topics; easy to read (may be too general); accuracy variable 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: you are looking for a topic limited to a certain
location; localized viewpoint; good if you want to understand the personality
of a certain location/population on a topic 2)Good for finding this
type of information: extremely
current events, medium detailed examples, who-what-where-etc examples,
second-hand quotes, situational context (what was happening in the world at
the time of the topic becoming important enough to cover) 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: detailed
discussion or different points of view;
4)Problems in using this
source: Lots of articles to go
through before necessarily reaching gold. 5) Source Reliability: Supposedly unbiased, but does reflect
audience/editor’s point of view often.
Sometimes stories published before all the facts are in. Can be very sensationalist (National
Enquirer) |
F. *Website (stand alone only): Almost
Everything can be found – but some times a humongous amount of time is
required to find gems in the World Wide Web as diary and dumpster. Good for reference, insider insights, but
sometimes too one sided (For example a
website that gives 1000 reasons Steven Seagal is a submoron). 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: Your topic is obscure; you need
super-obsessive detail level; you want information that exists nowhere else/insider
info 2)Good for finding this
type of information: Just about
any topic or type of information, recent or archival, with one caveat: huge amounts of information could be lies
or wrong. Websites are a great source
which you then must go out and verify immediately for veracity. Make sure to find and look at websites
with an OPPOSITE point of view – check who made it/owns it. 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: topics or
examples where your data must be verifiable and screened. 4)Problems in using this
source: Finding the website with
good information among the thousands that will be flagged by the search
engine 5) Source Reliability: Anyone with time on their hands can set up
a professional looking website. Will
require severe checking and crosschecking of information reliability. Often one point of view only – although
discussion rooms can provide a good idea of different points of view and a
range of related topics, opinions, and people |
G. *Newsgroup (http://groups.google.com): Absolutely everything ever discussed
publicly online: Good for snippets, opinions, and “happened to me” type of
examples/evidence. Excellent for
filling holes/missing examples in your rough draft stage. Depending on your ability to narrow search
terms, can be like finding a quarter in the ocean or the best/fastest source
site in existence 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: you need to
find the world’s most obscure, personal, secret detail; want to find people
to interview who’ve lived a topic/experience; need information fast. 2)Good for finding this
type of information: details,
discussions, opinions, quotes, eyewitness accounts, finding people to
interview, finding further terms, finding recommended other sources,
etc. There does not exist a question
that has not been answered/debated on newsgroups a few times over. 3)3)Bad for finding this
type of information: validated
facts; information in one place; finding authorities quickly -- beyond those
who are self proclaimed 4)Problems in using this
source: Not for amateur web
searching: you must be an expert at
screening information for noise content otherwise you will never be seen from
again. Opinion is more common than
fact: newsgroups are the internet’s
townsquare/bar/watercooler. 5) Source Reliability: Case by case |
H. Interview: Once arranged, can be a
great fast source for real life, functioning examples/details 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: you want
first hand, eyewitness information and details you could never know without
being at an event/time/happening. 2)Good for finding this
type of information: Extremely
vivid examples, quotes, insights, opinions of participants, everyman point of
view 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: Information
needed right away – interviews may take setup and time in hearing back from
an intended source. Also, you have to
drive the conversation so you can’t go into an interview without some basic
knowledge from which to draw out questions. 4)Problems in using this
source: If you are not a good
interviewer, you’ll have trouble. You
may not get the information you are hoping to get. Interviewee may have their own agenda/bias/or incorrect memory
of events and details. Compare
interviews to determine truth. 5) Source Reliability: You get one person’s point of view, with
insights, errors, limits, shifting memories, agendas and bias. |
I. Database indexing periodicals: Tells you
by subject what periodicals you should read – but now you have to find those
magazines/newspapers/journals 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: You have
access to a library that actually has the magazines that the database index
is going to tell you to look for 2)Good for finding this
type of information: Making a
research list across many magazines and journals with all types of points of
views. You will find a large field of
information with many gems and facts – if you have the time to look and
compare. 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: quick
searches. Small papers. 4)Problems in using this
source: You’ll find hundred of
relevant magazines and journals – some requiring you to fly out to obscure
locations where the periodical is archived.
5) Source Reliability: it’s an index: you’ll have to compare among the periodicals for bias. |
J.*Database of full text articles: http://pc.maricopa.edu/library/databases/databases.html FULL text to magazines
searchable by index – Perfect for local, hot, and current interest
topics. You’ll have to spend an hour or
two practicing how to use the search capability – but well worth the
investment. 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: you want the timeliness of magazine articles – across
most times and places. It’s all there
without having to leave a chair. 2)Good for finding this
type of information: details, quotes, points of view, layman to expert
explanations, obscure and specialist info. 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: people who are lazy and just pick
the first four things found. If you
don’t have the time to read and data mine, the database will either be
overwhelming or you’ll pick articles haphazardly or that only support your
thesis’ point of view – leaving gaps. 4)Problems in using this
source: Not as comprehensive as a
database indexing periodicals – which can lead to missed sources/opposing
opinions etc. 5) Source Reliability: depends on the periodical, but typically,
since database of full text are expensive, utilize established periodicals. |
K. Film/video/movies/Documentaries: Good for 2
hr overviews of a topic, good for a particular audience’s understanding of a
group or topic, good if you learn better/become inspired by seeing a example
given life. Don’t forget you can also
search screenplays for quotes that define the topic. 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: a realistic
overview given life can be a better summary:
Think how quickly and specifically you can learn and relate to the
range of horrors of being in a concentration camp from Schindler’s List rather than from a book when you just
need an overview understanding. 2)Good for finding this
type of information: more valuable for the impression it creates than the
subjective facts represented/underlying the plot. If you have trouble understanding a topic or an issue, a
film/movie may present it in a visceral way that may inspire understanding or
a passion to learn further. Good for
some quotable examples – second hand thru the eyes of the filmmaker. 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: use as a
primary source of subtopics, since some important ones may be left out by the
demand of time. 4)Problems in using this
source: you have a director’s
point of view. In many movies,
entertainment comes first before documentation: check your facts. 5) Source Reliability: variable, but typically not a “word as
truth” source |
L. Government documents: Good for
official versions, laws, statistics, and price tags. Dry reading, but may have the quality of
detail that make paper content GOLDEN. 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: You need
statistics, need to know costs, need data from experiments and/or studies. 2)Good for finding this
type of information: topics that have a government involvement –
regardless if the government’s rule is as regulator (FDA), sponsor (National
Endowment of the Arts), or interference (the new CyberSecurity bills). Also good for giving a look at what a
particular administration was concerned with (who and why was the meese
commission ordered?), what issues were considered of national, civic, or
“American” importance during a particular time period (eg Red Hunting during
McCarthyism) 3)Bad for finding this type of information: exciting
reading or different points of view. 4)Problems in using this
source: Language may sometimes be legalese; sometimes the most important
fact gained from a government document is WHAT IS NOT
STUDIED/COVERED/AVAILABLE [think: why is a subject omitted?]. Also, studies and published documents are
done for a purpose, whether pay back, appeasing the nation, creating a sense
of importance – Don’t believe the hype, always remember that first and
foremost is THE HYPE and THE SPIN. 5) Source Reliability: official versions – supposedly the truth. |
M. Performance/events/sports’ games: You become the
interpreter of events – excellent detail limited only by what you see. But make sure to find opposing opinions –
what and how you saw may not be the only way the event “went down” 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: you want the
excitement of story telling in your paper – and you know how to tell the tale
well 2)Good for finding this
type of information: Powerful
intros, attention-grabbing sections of a paper 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: extended
parts of your paper – there may be a tendency to overquote and underanalyse,
reducing a paper from research to one-sided though excited journalism. 4)Problems in using this
source: What did your eyes not see?
What was happening behind the scenes?
Can you stay objective if what you’re seeing involves an emotional
issue (money for AIDS) or a favorite cause (defeat of your favorite team,
performance of your favorite musical piece by terrible musicians)? 5) Source Reliability: You are the chronicler of the tale – be
ready to defend rigorously against people who saw it differently, even
perhaps as opposite of what you witnessed. |
N. BOOKS OF QUOTATIONS: If you have
no idea how to start a paper, a good way to find something interesting about
a topic. Good for comparisons of
opinions from different people/ groups/times 1)Type of topic this
source is best for: You need a
very brief witty or summary entry into your topic or subtopic. Can sometimes reveal weaknesses or
problems with an individual or topic that would otherwise go unnoticed. 2)Good for finding this
type of information: Starting
papers; For introductions and conclusions;
for a minor detail or
example to round off a paragraph. 3)Bad for finding this
type of information: Primary
examples for or against a topic – it’s a fallacy to assume a celebrity
in a field is actually validating a
subject by giving his opinion, no matter how smart or clever the saying may
be. 4)Problems in using this source: Make sure the source is
appropriate to the quote: quoting
rapper DMX about World peace will sound very very dumb. 5) Source Reliability: None:
quotations of this sort are usually just opinions – even if insightful
ones. |
O. PRODUCT/MANUFACTURER HOMEPAGE: lots of junk and marketing to go
thru. Consider visiting opinion (eg
www.epinions.com) or review sites first (www.consumerreports.com). Don’t forget the single most powerful
source of images of products, with descriptions and pricing: www.ebay.com |
P. Lyrics: Good for direct example of a [usually youth] culture’s concerns, fears,& needs. 1)Examining, for example, the lyrics of political songs in the 60’s will help understand how the left engaged issues of debate and concern; Examining lyrics of 90’s original gangster rap will show how the crimey attitude would become as marketable as the gangster movies of depression era America. 2)Music is the passion and escapism of a particular
audience – examine to feel the pulse of a group, examine to learn the Hearts
of Darkness and psychic needs of (sometimes) a trend, a taste, a subculture
or a generation. You’ll have to think
like an anthropologist, but you might dig into a depth of understanding few
have touched before. |
Q. Museums Online: Many
people don’t realize how much can be learned by looking at the right picture,
image, sculpture, or artwork. Check
into online museums that exist for almost any subject you can seek (From the
Museum of Dung in Korea to the Liberace Museum in Vegas). Check into online museums that may have
special and specialist exhibits --- rare information, new found
information, and refined and tried opinions can be a click away. You’ll also sometimes find new student
guides and expert material guides and bibliographies – links and sources for
more information. Not to mention the
email addresses and names of supposed experts in a particular field. |