HOW TO MAKE
SURE YOUR TOPIC IS IN ARGUMENTATIVE FORM
reminder: topic for papers must be
argumentative
and narrowed down appropriately. By nature of being argumentative,
there must exist opposite or opposing points of view.
Ask this question as a test of whether your thesis is in
argumentative form:
What counterarguments do you expect to address OR what kinds
of counterarguments may you have to address?
If you can't find any possible opposite/opposing point
of view to your argument, you probably don't have a thesis in argumentative
form.
EXAMPLES:
1)WRONG: Effects of nerve gas on soldiers who survive
chemical attacks
OK/ARGUMENTATIVE FORM: Nerve gas
exposure continues to harm the health of survivors long
after the attack
2)WRONG: Problems in treating Alzheimer patients
OK/ARGUMENTATIVE FORM:
Alzheimers victims in nursing
homes face more severe problems than those who receive
home care.
3)WRONG: Robots and the negative effects on the
economy
OK/ARGUMENTATIVE FORM:
Robots are gradually replacing
the blue collar worker in car manufacturing plants.
4) WRONG: Gambling
and corruption at the Wild Horse Pass Casino
OK/ARGUMENTATIVE FORM: Corruption has
resulted
from the gambling practices at the
Casino.
Think of it
in terms of having to take a specific point
of view or stand in a topic.
For example, in a debate,
you can't argue that there are "Different treatments
for
dealing with Cancer": that's an informative paper,
appropriate to ENG101 or call for an informative paper.
For the final
paper in this class you could compare
and contrast or take a point of view related to this.
SO YOU COULD
ARGUE: "Herbal treatments have
become an
effective alternative to cancer patients not responding
to Chemotherapy"
NARROWING A TOPIC:
Narrowing a topic requires
you to start at the most general form of a topic (eg,
health, cars, education, elderly, etc), which is level 1, then narrow it down
by any one way 6 times [look at the handout on how to narrow, for example, by
who, what, group affected, etc], always repeating the last level.
ONCE YOU have THE
TOPIC in 6th level narrowing, you must put
it in ARGUMENTATIVE FORM:
FOR
EXAMPLE:
Student has Argumentative paper
general interest: something about cloning
level 1 narrowing into a general topic: Cloning
level 2 narrowing: Cloning: good or
bad?
level 3 narrowing: Dangers of Cloning
level 4 narrowing: Dangers of human
cloning
level 5 narrowing: Clonaid:
have they mastered the dangers of human cloning?
level 6 narrowing: The ethical issues
faced as Clonaid offers human cloning for a price
Argumentative: Human cloning becomes a form of
vanity when cloning is made into an unregulated corporate
commodity by Clonaid
For example
Student has Argumentative paper
general interest: nursing homes
level 1 narrowing into a general topic: elderly
level 2 narrowing: nursing homes
level 3 narrowing: regulating nursing
homes
level 4 narrowing: regulating nursing homes
in AZ
level 5 narrowing: Regulating nursing
homes in AZ: failing at their jobs?
level 6 narrowing: Why are the agencies
regulating nursing homes in AZ failing at their jobs?
Argumentative: The agencies regulating nursing
homes in AZ are failing at their jobs because they have no legal accountability
for their mistakes
3rd example of proper narrowing:
Student has
argumentative paper general interest in: hot rods
level 1: cars
level 2: hot rods
level 3: hot rod racing
level 4: illegal hot rod racing
level 5: illegal hot rod racing in AZ
level 6: police deterrence of illegal hot
rod racing in AZ
argumentative: police deterrence programs have
failed to stop illegal hot rod racing in AZ